QTL Map Information |
Chromosome: | 2 |
QTL Peak Location: | 33 (cM) |
QTL Span: | 30-36 (cM) 9.3-11.2 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | MCW0082 |
Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
Peak: | |
Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
Lower, "Suggestive": | MCW0341 |
Marker type: | Microsatellites |
Analysis type: | QTL |
Model tested: | n/a |
Test base: | Genome-wise |
Threshold significance level: | n/a |
 |
P_values | <0.2 | Dominance effect: | n/a |
Additive effect: | n/a |
Associated Gene: | n/a |
Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
Extended information: |
(none) |
User inputs on QTL #1870
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
QTL Experiment in Brief |
Animals: | Two genetically different outcross broiler dam lines from the White Plymouth Rock breed were chosen as the foundation of the experimental population. Founder chickens, parents, offspring, and grandoffspring are indicated as (G) 0, 1, 2, and 3. |
Breeds associated:
n/a
|
Design: | The G1 chickens were mated to produce G2 full sibs. The G2 chickens were mated wtih several G2 chickens from different families to produce G3 chickens. The G3 offspring, therefore, are mostly half-sibs with a small number of full-sibs. |
Analysis: | Traits measured were BW23, BW48, and FIFA. Within each hatch, observations deviating more than 3 SD from the mean of that hatch, were considered the result of measurement errors and therefore were excluded from the analysis. |
Software: | |
Notes: | |
Links: | Edit |
Reference |
Authors: | van Kaam JB, Groenen MA, Bovenhuis H, Veenendaal A, Vereijken AL, van ArendonkJA. |
Affiliation: | Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, Wageningen Institute of Animal Sciences,Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.jan-thijs.vankaam@alg.vf.wau.nl |
Title: | Whole genome scan in chickens for quantitative trait loci affecting growth andfeed efficiency. |
Journal: | Poultry Sci, 1999, 78(1):15-23 |
Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |

User inputs on reference #10023741
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|