QTL Map Information |
Chromosome: | 7 |
QTL Peak Location: | 75.15 (cM) |
QTL Span: | 0-148.4 (cM)
|
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
Upper, "Significant": | BM3033 |
Peak: | |
Lower, "Significant": | MCM208 |
Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
Marker type: | Microsatellites |
Analysis type: | QTL |
Model tested: | Mendelian |
Test base: | Comparison-wise |
Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
LikelihoodR | 3.9 | P_values | <0.03 | Dominance effect: | n/a |
Additive effect: | n/a |
Associated Gene: | n/a |
Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
Links:
Edit |
Map view
|
Extended information: |
(none) |
User inputs on QTL #14015
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
QTL Experiment in Brief |
Animals: | INRA401 flock, a Romanov (prolific breed) x Berrichon du Cher (meat breed), which has not been selected for wool traits. Phenotypic traits examined in a mid-side wool sample were: staple length and for fibre diameter, the mean and coefficient of var |
Breeds associated:
|
Design: | 690 ewes were crossed with 30 rams yielding 31 to 45 progeny per family. Forty microsatellites covering 20 of the 26 autosomes were typed, covering a total length of 600cM. Chromosomes 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 12, 18 and 26 were represented by only 1 marker. |
Analysis: | Data was analysed using a linear model that took into account variance resulting from sex, batch, age class and birth-suckling status. Monte Carlo-Markov Chain method in CRIMAP used all pedigree and marker information available. |
Software: | CRIMAP |
Notes: | |
Links: | Edit |
Reference |
Authors: | Ponz R, Moreno C, Allain D, Elsen JM, Lantier F, Lantier I, Brunel JC, Pérez-Enciso M |
Affiliation: | Station d'Amélioration Génétique des Animaux, INRA, BP27, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France |
Title: | Assessment of genetic variation explained by markers for wool traits in sheep via a segment mapping approach |
Journal: | Mammalian genome, 2001, 12:569-572 |
Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |

User inputs on reference #11420622
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|