| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 15 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 27.36 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 27.36-27.36 (cM)
33.9-33.9 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | rs81288002 |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | SNP |
| Analysis type: | Association |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | Genome-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
P_values | <0.05 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #153435
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Animals were American Yorkshire and British Yorkshire pigs. |
| Breeds associated:
|
| Design: | Animals were genotyped using the Illumina PorcineSNP80 BeadChip and analyzed for backfat at 10th rib and days to 100 kg. A total of 53,233 SNPs were used for analysis. |
| Analysis: | Single-population and combined-population analyses were performed using a linear mixed model. A meta-analysis was also performed based on the single-population analyses. |
| Software: | GCTA, PLINK |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Jiang Y, Tang S, Wang C, Wang Y, Qin Y, Wang Y, Zhang J, Song H, Mi S, Yu F, Xiao W, Zhang Q, Ding X |
| Affiliation: | National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, P.R. China. |
| Title: | A genome-wide association study of growth and fatness traits in two pig populations with different genetic backgrounds. |
| Journal: | Journal of animal science, 2018, 96(3):806-816 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
| Additional Information |
|---|
| Comments: | Meta-analysis |
User inputs on reference #29528397
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
