| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 5 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 0.00 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 0.00-0.00 (cM)
9.9-9.9 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | rs80854359 |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | SNP |
| Analysis type: | Association |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | Genome-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | Suggestive |
 |
P_values | <1 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | PICK1 (protein interacting with PRKCA 1) |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #211747
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Pigs were from three American Yorkshire populations and one British Yorkshire population. |
| Breeds associated:
|
| Design: | Animals were genotyped using using the Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip and analyzed for total number born and number born alive. |
| Analysis: | Single-population GWAS was carried out using linear mixed models. Single-trait meta-analysis and multi-trait meta-analysis were then carried out using Fisher's method and chi-square tests, respectively. |
| Software: | PLINK, GCTA |
| Notes: | |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Jiang Y, Tang S, Xiao W, Yun P, Ding X |
| Affiliation: | National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China |
| Title: | A genome-wide association study of reproduction traits in four pig populations with different genetic backgrounds |
| Journal: | Asian-Australasian journal of animal sciences, 2020, 33(9):1400-1410 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
| Additional Information |
|---|
| Comments: | XD population |
User inputs on reference #32054232
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
