| QTL Map Information |
|---|
| Chromosome: | 11 |
| QTL Peak Location: | 32.44 (cM) |
| QTL Span: | 32.44-32.44 (cM)
29.7-29.7 (Mbp) |
 |
Upper, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Upper, "Significant": | n/a |
| Peak: | rs80928724 |
| Lower, "Significant": | n/a |
| Lower, "Suggestive": | n/a |
| Marker type: | SNP |
| Analysis type: | Association |
| Model tested: | Mendelian |
| Test base: | Chromosome-wise |
| Threshold significance level: | Significant |
 |
VARIANCE | 2.58 | | P_values | <0.05 | | Dominance effect: | n/a |
| Additive effect: | n/a |
| Associated Gene: | n/a |
| Cis/Trans acting type: |  |
| Links:
NCBI GeneDB | Edit |
Map view
|
| Extended information: |
|---|
| (none) |
User inputs on QTL #95290
Add your annotations
Add your comments
Report problems
|
| QTL Experiment in Brief |
|---|
| Animals: | Boars were of type Pietrain x cross-bred sow. Dams were either crosses of German Edelschwein and German Landrace (cross I and II) or F2 sows based on Large White x (Leicoma x German Landrace) (cross III).
Animal breed (IDs) involved: |
| Breeds associated:
|
| Design: | Pigs were genotyped using the Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip and analyzed for growth, carcass, meat quality, and boar taint-related traits. A total of 43,527 SNPs were used for analysis. |
| Analysis: | GWAS was performed using the genome-wide rapid association using mixed model and regression (GRAMMAR) approach. |
| Software: | GenABEL in R |
| Notes: | This study also includes principal component analysis; this data was not entered. |
| Links: | Edit |
| Reference |
|---|
| Authors: | Große-Brinkhaus C, Storck LC, Frieden L, Neuhoff C, Schellander K, Looft C, Tholen E |
| Affiliation: | Institute of Animal Science, University of Bonn, Endenicher Allee 15, 53115, Bonn, Germany |
| Title: | Genome-wide association analyses for boar taint components and testicular traits revealed regions having pleiotropic effects |
| Journal: | BMC genetics, 2015, 16: 36 |
| Links: |
PubMed | Abstract | List all data
| Edit |
User inputs on reference #25879925
Add your comments
Note similar findings
Note contradictions
|
